Re: TODO: GNU TLS

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Date: 2006-12-29 19:49:50
Message-ID: 1167421790.21290.18.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> entirely.
>
> 4) GNUTLS development seems more active? OpenSSL has been in a frozen/mature
> state for a while. I don't understand why OpenSSL is still labelled as
> 0.9.x, which might indicate alpha quality, under heavy development.
>
> I don't find the reasons too compelling - but they are points to
> consider.

5) GNUTLS does not run well under all of our supported platforms.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Cheers,
> mark
>
--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roman Kononov 2006-12-29 19:54:41 Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing
Previous Message mark 2006-12-29 19:16:05 Re: TODO: GNU TLS