On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 16:48 -0500, Gregory Stark wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes
> > into "operator families", as per discussion last week. It's far from
> > ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for comments. What's done
> > is ...
> > Comments?
> Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress
> would be more visible?
I thought it did? Tom's marked this clearly as WIP.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Roman Kononov||Date: 2006-12-27 21:43:49|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing handling of underflows,|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-12-27 21:35:33|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing|