Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Interface for pg_autovacuum

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Jim Nasby" <jim(dot)nasby(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>,"Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>,"PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Interface for pg_autovacuum
Date: 2006-12-21 15:04:43
Message-ID: 1166713483.3783.66.camel@silverbirch.site (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 09:47 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:

> On the other hand, this would be the only part of the system where  
> the official interface/API is a system catalog table. Do we really  
> want to expose the internal representation of something as our API?  
> That doesn't seem wise to me...

Define and agree the API (the hard bit) and I'll code it (the easy bit).

We may as well have something on the table, even if it changes later.

Dave: How does PgAdmin handle setting table-specific autovacuum
parameters? (Does it?)

-- 
  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: JEAN-PIERRE PELLETIERDate: 2006-12-21 15:10:07
Subject: log_min_error_statement and parameters value
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-12-21 14:56:30
Subject: Re: Tuning single row operations

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group