Re: join and sort on 'best match'

From: Ragnar <gnari(at)hive(dot)is>
To: Ashish Ahlawat <ahlawat(dot)ashish(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: join and sort on 'best match'
Date: 2006-12-15 19:46:47
Message-ID: 1166212007.6369.194.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On fös, 2006-12-15 at 22:10 +0530, Ashish Ahlawat wrote:
>
>
> Hi team
>
> I was just asking that If table ITEM3 has all the columns then why we
> need to have a join ?? even we put a sorting very easily.

> On 12/14/06, Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi, Ashish,
>
> "Ashish Ahlawat" <ahlawat(dot)ashish(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > if table *Item 3 : news, nature, greenpeace, whale has all
> clmn y v need
> > join ??*

it seems these where not columns of a table.

the organisation was like this:

table items:

id name
-----------
1 foo
2 bar
3 item3

table tags:

tag_id text
---------------------
1 news
2 nature
3 tennisballs
4 greenpeace
5 cannibals
6 whale

and table items_tags:

item_id tag_id
----------------
3 1
3 2
3 4
3 6
...

so table items needs to be joined to table tags via
table items_tags to retrieve the connections from item3
to news, nature, greepeace and whales.

gnari

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aaron Bono 2006-12-15 21:15:12 Unions and Grouping
Previous Message Ashish Ahlawat 2006-12-15 16:40:22 Re: join and sort on 'best match'