Re: pg_standby and build farm

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Euler Taveira de Oliveira" <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_standby and build farm
Date: 2006-12-14 12:19:10
Message-ID: 1166098751.3733.77.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 19:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> writes:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> Should this be reworked as an src/bin program? Or is the contrib module
> >> the best form for this in 8.3?
> >>
> > Please submit it to -patches. IMHO it should stay in src/bin because
> > it'll be part of a solution that is tightly integrated to core (PITR).

Posted to pgsql-patches

> I think src/bin would be a seriously bad place for it, because that
> carries the presumption that "there can be only one", whereas in reality
> this will be more like an example of one way to do it. contrib seems OK.

Agreed.

I will be updating it each time we have feedback on integration with
various BAR systems to provide more options as standard.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-12-14 12:19:37 Re: recovery.conf parsing problems
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-12-14 12:04:10 pg_standby