Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Date: 2011-02-24 16:02:57
Message-ID: 11659.1298563377@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
> On 2011-02-24 5:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh, did we decide to do it that way?  OK with me, but the submitted docs
>> are woefully inadequate on the point.  This behavior is going to have to
>> be explained extremely clearly (and even so, I bet we'll get bug reports
>> about it :-().

> I'm ready to put more effort into the documentation if the patch is 
> going in, but I really don't want to waste my time just to hear that the 
> patch is not going to be in 9.1.  Does this sound acceptable?

I've found some things I don't like about it, but the only part that
seems far short of being committable is the documentation.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-24 16:20:48
Subject: wCTE: about the name of the feature
Previous:From: Marko TiikkajaDate: 2011-02-24 15:57:27
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group