Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
> On 2011-02-24 5:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh, did we decide to do it that way? OK with me, but the submitted docs
>> are woefully inadequate on the point. This behavior is going to have to
>> be explained extremely clearly (and even so, I bet we'll get bug reports
>> about it :-().
> I'm ready to put more effort into the documentation if the patch is
> going in, but I really don't want to waste my time just to hear that the
> patch is not going to be in 9.1. Does this sound acceptable?
I've found some things I don't like about it, but the only part that
seems far short of being committable is the documentation.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-02-24 16:20:48|
|Subject: wCTE: about the name of the feature|
|Previous:||From: Marko Tiikkaja||Date: 2011-02-24 15:57:27|
|Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies|