Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Switching to XML

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Switching to XML
Date: 2006-12-10 17:51:28
Message-ID: 1165773088.13210.62.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
> > Until you can come up with a reason why we *shouldn't* move to XML. I
> > believe this issue is settled.
> 
> I have previously listed the issues in favor and against.  Check the 
> start of this thread.

The only thing I see is that you don't want to move because all the
tools that are available for docbook sgml are also available for docbook
xml.

Am I missing anything?

Joshua D. Drake


> 
-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-12-10 18:07:10
Subject: Re: Switching to XML
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-12-10 17:42:00
Subject: Re: Switching to XML

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group