Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Date: 2005-06-29 17:40:20
Message-ID: 11646.1120066820@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

I notice that AddRoleMems/DelRoleMems assume that ADMIN OPTION is not
inherited indirectly; that is it must be granted directly to you.
This seems wrong; SQL99 has under <privileges>

19) B has the WITH ADMIN OPTION on a role if a role authorization
descriptor identifies the role as granted to B WITH ADMIN OPTION
or a role authorization descriptor identifies it as granted WITH
ADMIN OPTION to another applicable role for B.

and in the Access Rules for <grant role statement>

1) Every role identified by <role granted> shall be contained
in the applicable roles for A and the corresponding role
authorization descriptors shall specify WITH ADMIN OPTION.

I can't see any support in the spec for the idea that WITH ADMIN OPTION
doesn't flow through role memberships in the same way as ordinary
membership; can you quote someplace that implies this?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2005-06-29 18:24:24 Re: Proposal: associative arrays for plpgsql (concept)
Previous Message Douglas McNaught 2005-06-29 17:20:17 Re: Proposal: associative arrays for plpgsql (concept)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-06-29 18:36:51 Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-06-29 16:31:03 Change Ownership Permission Checks