On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:28 +0100, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> Mammoth Replicator is not synchronous anyway ...
> > That's a shame. I thought we might be able get a head start in that way.
> Huh? Why should that be a shame?
Because I wanted it to be synchronous and it is not...
> Do you have anything better to propose?
On -hackers, I think, but not yet.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-11-22 15:27:58|
|Subject: Re: bad plan with custom data types |
|Previous:||From: Teodor Sigaev||Date: 2006-11-22 14:35:43|
|Subject: Re: Tsearch + polish ispell + polish locale|
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2006-11-22 16:02:38|
|Subject: Re: Collateral for LISA 06|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2006-11-22 14:56:07|
|Subject: Re: Speakers wanted for OpenSolarisCon Germany|