| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mark Steben" <msteben(at)autorevenue(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Question on partitioning |
| Date: | 2006-11-16 17:38:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1163698723.27956.554.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 15:13 -0500, Mark Steben wrote:
> Regarding partitioning – I set up a testing table – parent table and 4
> partitioning children’s tables inheriting the
>
> Attributes of the parent. I inserted 1800 rows in all – 450 equitably
> in each partition. The CHECK constraints work great.
>
> The PART_ID column, defined as SMALLINT, Is the partitioning
> column.
>
You'll probably want to look at the caveats here
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIONING-CAVEATS
especially the ones about cross-datatype comparisons in CHECK
constraints.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Will Cameron | 2006-11-16 17:40:49 | Re: all postgres users do "not exist" |
| Previous Message | Albert | 2006-11-16 09:51:41 | PostGreSQL cannot start after windows update |