Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Indicate disabled triggers in \d

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Indicate disabled triggers in \d
Date: 2006-11-11 00:16:53
Message-ID: 1163204213.5342.46.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 16:21 +1100, Brendan Jurd wrote:
> Minor fix to the previous patch; result7 was not being cleared at the
> end of the block.

The patch still leaks result7 circa line 1400 (CVS HEAD). I didn't look
closely, but you probably also leak result7 circa line 1209, if result6
is NULL.

(Yeah, we definitely need to refactor describeOneTableDetails().)

-Neil



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-11-11 00:34:09
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.2 (from CVS devel) first impressions
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-11-10 22:32:52
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Brendan JurdDate: 2006-11-11 02:38:13
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Indicate disabled triggers in \d
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-11-10 22:32:52
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group