On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 01:31 -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 10:53:16AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 04:27:13PM -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> > > > It surprised me to notice that there appears to be no interest in
> > > > funding developers.
> > >
> > > The trouble with that is that it's a much "lumpier" thing to try to
> > > arrange.
> > > ...
> > How about a bounty system, where you describe work to be done and give a
> > fixed price or the implementation and people can apply for this job?
> Maybe my glasses are especially rose-colored, but I think there's
> plenty-enough core developers that are employed by commercial PostgreSQL
> companies so that anyone who wants to fund development of a specific
> feature can do so.
Sure, but why shouldn't we help independent developers also contribute
Joshua D. Drake
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2006-11-09 20:01:46|
|Subject: Re: On what we want to support: infrastructure?|
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2006-11-09 10:32:35|
|Subject: Re: On what we want to support: travel?|
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Ron Mayer||Date: 2006-11-09 18:04:07|
|Subject: The support pages on postgresql.org|
|Previous:||From: Lukas Kahwe Smith||Date: 2006-11-09 10:42:32|
|Subject: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0|