Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG on zeta 1.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: kmh496 <kmh496(at)kornet(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG on zeta 1.0
Date: 2006-05-20 16:39:08
Message-ID: 11596.1148143148@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice
kmh496 <kmh496(at)kornet(dot)net> writes:
> 2006-05-20 (), 11:53 -0400, Tom Lane : 
>> It looks to me like you don't have DNS correctly configured on that
>> machine.  Every machine should be able to resolve "localhost" as
>> "127.0.0.1" --- that's standard.  Look at name resolution settings,
>> /etc/resolv.conf, that sort of thing.

> i think it's the port for an unknown reason.  I don't have any port
> number listed for 5543 but it gives me the same error when i try to use
> it.  If I use port 55543 however there is no problem.

Really?  That's very interesting.  Have you tried adding 5432 to
/etc/services and then referencing the port number by the name you
give it there?  I've never heard of a resolver rejecting numerical
specifications for low-numbered ports, but there's a first time for
everything ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: kmh496Date: 2006-05-20 17:09:07
Subject: Re: PG on zeta 1.0
Previous:From: kmh496Date: 2006-05-20 16:23:16
Subject: Re: PG on zeta 1.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group