Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [OT] PHP vs Postgresql argument on

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT] PHP vs Postgresql argument on
Date: 2006-09-15 19:29:09
Message-ID: 1158348549.29889.274.camel@dogma.v10.wvs (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-general
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 14:29 -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> "Karen Hill" <karen_hill22(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Looks like the PHP vs Postgresql argument is on slashdot.org's front
> > page.  Just giving everyone a heads up so they can go and defend
> > postgresql.
> 
> It looks like a discussion thread that doesn't require that much
> "defending" be done...

Sure, but it wasn't PostgreSQL that needed defending, Ramsus was
defending himself.

I wasn't at the conference, but he claims he was horribly
misrepresented.

At this point I think it's just a case of sensationalistic journalism.
That doesn't mean it won't hurt PostgreSQL a little though.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-09-15 22:33:58
Subject: Re: Recommendation of a slogan for PostgreSQL 8.2
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2006-09-15 18:47:04
Subject: Re: Quotes for release

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: zeljkoDate: 2006-09-15 19:38:10
Subject: Re: compressed protocol
Previous:From: Michael FuhrDate: 2006-09-15 19:18:00
Subject: Re: compressed protocol

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group