| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [OT] PHP vs Postgresql argument on |
| Date: | 2006-09-15 19:29:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1158348549.29889.274.camel@dogma.v10.wvs |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 14:29 -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> "Karen Hill" <karen_hill22(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Looks like the PHP vs Postgresql argument is on slashdot.org's front
> > page. Just giving everyone a heads up so they can go and defend
> > postgresql.
>
> It looks like a discussion thread that doesn't require that much
> "defending" be done...
Sure, but it wasn't PostgreSQL that needed defending, Ramsus was
defending himself.
I wasn't at the conference, but he claims he was horribly
misrepresented.
At this point I think it's just a case of sensationalistic journalism.
That doesn't mean it won't hurt PostgreSQL a little though.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-09-15 22:33:58 | Re: Recommendation of a slogan for PostgreSQL 8.2 |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-09-15 18:47:04 | Re: Quotes for release |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | zeljko | 2006-09-15 19:38:10 | Re: compressed protocol |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-09-15 19:18:00 | Re: compressed protocol |