| From: | Morus Walter <morus(dot)walter(at)experteer(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N |
| Date: | 2006-08-21 08:18:49 |
| Message-ID: | 1156148329.7339.319.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 16:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > The only complaint I can see is that someone
> > who wants pg_dump to dump out SERIAL so it appears just as he created
> > the table, doesn't get that. Could we have pg_dump do that if the
> > sequences all match the creation (weren't modified)?
>
> pg_dump's output is often very far from what you typed in anyway.
> My response to that person would be "get a life" ...
>
As the one who brought up the issue (again) I'd like to add that the
suggested solution sounds good to me.
Thanks a lot for your great work on postgres. You rock!
Morus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Kirpa | 2006-08-21 09:00:58 | Re: PostgreSQL on 64 bit Linux |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-21 06:07:41 | Updatable views |