| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence |
| Date: | 2001-12-16 02:02:27 |
| Message-ID: | 11531.1008468147@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> writes:
> I'm aware that this is not the /best/ solution to this problem, but
> it is better than the current breakage in pg_dump.
I'd dispute that, primarily because the patch blithely assumes that
there is no other kind of default value than a serial-created nextval().
It looks to me like it will either coredump or do the wrong thing
with other default-value strings.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brent Verner | 2001-12-16 02:10:05 | Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence |
| Previous Message | Brent Verner | 2001-12-16 01:33:50 | Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brent Verner | 2001-12-16 02:10:05 | Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence |
| Previous Message | Brent Verner | 2001-12-16 01:33:50 | Re: system catalog relation of a table and a serial sequence |