Re: Speeding up query, Joining 55mil and 43mil records.

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: nicky <nicky(at)valuecare(dot)nl>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Speeding up query, Joining 55mil and 43mil records.
Date: 2006-06-21 17:03:41
Message-ID: 1150909421.26538.135.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 08:47, nicky wrote:
> Hello People,

SNIPPAGE

> The query above takes around 42 minutes.
>
> However, i also have a wimpy desktop machine with 1gb ram. Windows
> with MSSQL 2000 (default installation), same database structure, same
> indexes, same query, etc and it takes 17 minutes. The big difference
> makes me think that i've made an error with my PostgreSQL
> configuration. I just can't seem to figure it out.

What is the difference between the two plans (i.e. explain on both boxes
and compare)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-06-21 17:12:11 Re: Speeding up query, Joining 55mil and 43mil records.
Previous Message jody brownell 2006-06-21 16:49:49 Re: Help tuning autovacuum - seeing lots of relationbloat