Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: todo items history

From: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: todo items history
Date: 2006-04-26 22:16:16
Message-ID: 1146089777.19962.44.camel@voyager.truesoftware.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thank you :)

On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 18:14 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> > > Not really, though the CVS history shows when the item was added.  Many
> > > items represent complex threads of discussion, so only the general
> > > conclusion is in the TODO list.  Is there an items that is unclear?
> > 
> > The reason I asked this question is because I would like to contribute.
> > In fact I proposed my first patch today (of course with Tom's and
> > Alvaro's coaching). I thought maybe more is kept than general
> > conclusion. I guess I have to search in the CVS history and annoy people
> > by asking all kinds of questions.
> 
> Usually we can clarify any item, and in fact the discussion details
> might have changed since the item was added, so by asking, you get
> current information.
> 
> 


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: TaralDate: 2006-04-26 22:22:21
Subject: Re: ANSI-strict pointer aliasing rules
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-04-26 22:14:03
Subject: Re: todo items history

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group