Re: Hardware: HP StorageWorks MSA 1500

From: Mark Lewis <mark(dot)lewis(at)mir3(dot)com>
To: Mikael Carneholm <Mikael(dot)Carneholm(at)WirelessCar(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hardware: HP StorageWorks MSA 1500
Date: 2006-04-20 18:43:20
Message-ID: 1145558600.29754.152.camel@archimedes
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hmmm. We use an MSA 1000 with Fibre Channel interconnects. No real
complaints, although I was a little bit disappointed by the RAID
controller's battery-backed write cache performance; tiny random writes
are only about 3 times as fast with write caching enabled as with it
disabled, I had (perhaps naively) hoped for more. Sequential scans from
our main DB (on a 5-pair RAID 10 set with 15k RPM drives) get roughly
80MB/sec.

Getting the redundant RAID controllers to fail over correctly on Linux
was a big headache and required working the tech support phone all day
until we finally got to the deep guru who knew the proper undocumented
incantations.

-- Mark Lewis

On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 20:00 +0200, Mikael Carneholm wrote:
> We're going to get one for evaluation next week (equipped with dual
> 2Gbit HBA:s and 2x14 disks, iirc). Anyone with experience from them,
> performance wise?
>
> Regards,
> Mikael
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Duddridge 2006-04-20 19:29:46 Recovery will take 10 hours
Previous Message Mikael Carneholm 2006-04-20 18:00:03 Hardware: HP StorageWorks MSA 1500