| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, fgp(at)phlo(dot)org, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery" |
| Date: | 2011-02-01 00:25:59 |
| Message-ID: | 11454.1296519959@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I agree, 28 is a completely off-point category. But it wasn't in 40
>> before, either --- we are talking about where it currently says
>> ADMIN_SHUTDOWN, no? I'd vote for keeping it in class 57 (operator
>> intervention), as that is both sensible and a minimal change from
>> current behavior.
> Seems a little weird to me, since the administrator hasn't done
> anything.
Sure he has: he issued the DROP DATABASE command that's causing the
system to disconnect standby sessions.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-02-01 00:30:35 | Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery" |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-01 00:17:12 | Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery" |