| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file |
| Date: | 2006-04-15 18:55:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1145127316.3273.12.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 12:24 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> And if we can't provide one, should we supply an SQL function
> to return the current WAL name?
I'll do this. Just give me a few days to get my feet under the new desk.
I know its well past time I sorted this and a few other things out.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-04-15 20:20:45 | Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-15 18:50:05 | Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-15 19:18:11 | Re: [PATCH] Reduce noise from tsort |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-15 18:50:05 | Re: Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file |