Re: control pg_hba.conf via SQL

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: control pg_hba.conf via SQL
Date: 2006-03-30 19:49:49
Message-ID: 1143748199.27969.14981.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 12:43, Chris Browne wrote:
> andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net (Andrew Dunstan) writes:
> > We don't have the luxury of being able just to throw out old stuff
> > because we think it might be neater to do it another way. The current
> > rules for HBA are order dependent. The issue raised as I understood it
> > was not to invent a new scheme but to be able to manage it from inside
> > a postgres session.
>
> If the need to support "legacy usage" mandates something like Svenne
> Krap's suggestion of a control flag inside pg_hba.conf, or something
> otherwise akin to Robert Treat's suggestions, then I think this *is*
> designing something new/neater.
>
> I think it would take a fair bit of work (and kludging of design) to
> build something to slavishly emulate pg_hba.conf; it seems to me that
> it is a much better thing to have an inside-the-database HBA scheme be
> based on what is a good design inside-the-database.
>

+1

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2006-03-30 20:05:06 Re: control pg_hba.conf via SQL
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-03-30 19:28:55 Re: pg_class catalog question...