Re: sparse (static analyzer) report

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: sparse (static analyzer) report
Date: 2005-01-15 20:45:12
Message-ID: 11395.1105821912@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> writes:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>> What I miss most in both C and Java is the lispish ability to write
>> expressions like:
>>
>> foo = bar() || baz() || qux();

> Are you sure that C doesn't guarenty short circuit evaluation?
> I don't have my C reference handy, but my memory is that evaluation
> will stop after the first function call that returns true in the
> above expression.

Yeah, but you can only find out the boolean result, not the actually
returned value --- that is, foo will get 1 or 0.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-01-15 20:46:44 Re: FATAL: catalog is missing 1 attribute(s) for relid 16396
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2005-01-15 20:38:08 Re: sparse (static analyzer) report