On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 13:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I object ... this is still trying to enforce tupdesc refcounting on much
> more of the system than I think useful or prudent.
Well, the patch adds management of TupleDesc refcounts solely for the
return value of lookup_rowtype_tupdesc(). If we're going to use
reference counting there at all, I don't see a way do make the
refcounting any less invasive.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2006-01-22 18:51:26|
|Subject: Re: Allow an alias for the target table in UPDATE/DELETE|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-01-22 18:43:36|
|Subject: Re: TupleDesc refcounting |