On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 20:03 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Changes as discussed. "singletransaction.patch" attached.
> I meant to ask, why is this not the default or only behavior?
Historically, it didn't work that way, so I hadn't thought to change
that behaviour. We could I suppose... but I'm happy with just an option
to do --single-transaction.
> patch does not contain a documentation update, and so the user has no
> information about why to use this option or not.
I was waiting for tech approval of the patch before writing the docs. A
doc patch is enclosed.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
Description: text/x-patch (1.9 KB)
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-12-18 19:04:53|
|Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options |
|Previous:||From: Volkan YAZICI||Date: 2005-12-18 10:13:17|
|Subject: tuple count and v3 functions in psql for COPY|