On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 15:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 13:59 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Would -1 work, or just confuse people?
> > That was my preference, I just thought it wouldn't be popular...
> > So I'll happily change that.
> OK. While you're at it, I didn't like the long name either ;-).
> We do not use the abbrevation txn anywhere, so I think it's bad to
> introduce it here. I'd vote for spelling out --single-transaction,
> or maybe just --single. I believe you can abbreviate long switch names
> to any unique prefix, so there's not really any more typing here.
Changes as discussed. "singletransaction.patch" attached.
-1 or --single-transaction
Functions work as described.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2005-12-17 19:03:52|
|Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2005-12-17 16:25:51|
|Subject: Re: TODO Item - Add system view to show free space map|