From:
"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To:
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>,
pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date:
2005-12-02 19:01:05
Message-ID:
1133550065.16716.16.camel@jd.commandprompt.com (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2005-11-21 22:38:17 from Seneca Cunningham <scunning(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
2005-11-22 00:50:48 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2005-11-22 01:09:16 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-11-22 20:49:24 from "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
2005-11-25 17:04:12 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-11-25 18:39:43 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2005-12-02 02:44:32 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 03:14:12 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 03:27:32 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 03:43:19 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 03:58:10 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 04:03:52 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 15:02:14 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2005-12-02 18:38:10 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 08:28:19 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2005-12-02 14:14:31 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 17:14:09 from Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
2005-12-02 17:28:38 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 18:23:35 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 18:32:42 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 18:39:00 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 18:47:18 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 18:52:07 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 19:01:05 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2005-12-02 20:12:15 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-02 20:27:41 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2005-12-03 11:11:40 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2005-12-03 13:01:19 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-03 14:48:57 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2005-12-03 14:53:52 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-03 15:14:46 from "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>
2005-12-03 15:27:37 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-12-04 03:52:22 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-ports
> OK, updated text:
>
> --with-openssl build with OpenSSL support
> --with-libedit-preferred prefer Libedit over Libreadline
> --without-readline do not use Libreadline/Libedit line editing
> --without-zlib do not use Zlib
This all seems kind of extra... Why not just:
--with-libedit Use libedit instead of readline
--with-readline Use readline instead of libedit (default)
--without-readline Use when readline is not available
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
In response to
Responses
pgsql-ports by date
Next :From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 20:12:15Subject : Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?Previous :From : Bruce MomjianDate : 2005-12-02 18:52:07Subject : Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 19:09:08Subject : Re: Numeric 508 datatypePrevious :From : Tom LaneDate : 2005-12-02 18:54:33Subject : Re: Numeric 508 datatype
pgsql-patches by date
Next :From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 19:09:08Subject : Re: Numeric 508 datatypePrevious :From : Tom LaneDate : 2005-12-02 18:54:33Subject : Re: Numeric 508 datatype
