| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
| Date: | 2005-12-02 08:57:14 |
| Message-ID: | 1133513834.2906.523.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 23:34 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Where are we on this patch? It is ready for the patch queue?
It's good to be applied, AFAIK.
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > As previously agreed, reviewing this is a 2 stage process:
> > 1. review/possibly agree OK to commit
> > 2. check with everybody on GENERAL that the restriction to 508 is
> > acceptable
> >
> > Figure there's no point doing (2) until we agree the proposal/code is
> > workable.
I was hoping you'd give me a "this looks good enough to apply"
thumbs-up, then I'll ask for comments via a Weekly News item.
If I ask for comments and then it is technically rejected we would be
wasting everybody's time.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Terry Lee Tucker | 2005-12-02 09:04:38 | Re: Function returning SETOF |
| Previous Message | Cott Lang | 2005-12-02 07:32:26 | Re: postmaster / resolv.conf / dns problem |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-12-02 09:39:06 | Re: Using multi-row technique with COPY |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-12-02 08:28:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Volkan YAZICI | 2005-12-02 10:20:53 | Re: Case Conversion Fix for MB Chars |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-12-02 08:28:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |