| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Pollard, Mike" <mpollard(at)cincom(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: generalizing the planner knobs |
| Date: | 2005-12-02 03:37:26 |
| Message-ID: | 1133494646.9942.3.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 21:01 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> If we'd really like to avoid people using the knobs to rig queries,
> how about making them only work with explain analyze, useful for
> debugging but not so useful for actual queries.
That seems a pretty arbitrary limitation. I agree that it's not ideal to
have users adjust planner behavior via this means, but until we have
something better, I think applying that limitation would only make the
status quo worse.
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-02 03:43:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 03:27:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |