Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Date: 2005-11-30 18:59:35
Message-ID: 1133377185.4491.269.camel@camel (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 13:33, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Someone suggested earlier that we should drop the binaries for
> nonsupported versions completely from the ftp site. Thoughts on this?
> If not, they should at least go into OLD as well. But personally, I'm
> for dropping them completely. If you're on something that old (heck, we
> have 7.0 binaries..), you can still build from source.

I'm against the idea... the cost for us is minimal, and the hassle
involved in building from source is quite large. 

Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-11-30 19:12:08
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] What is the deal with mailing lists?
Previous:From: Joshua DrakeDate: 2005-11-30 18:52:05
Subject: Re: What is the deal with mailing lists?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-11-30 19:01:46
Subject: Re: Strange interval arithmetic
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-11-30 18:53:13
Subject: Shared locking in slru.c

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group