Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Date: 2005-11-30 18:59:35
Message-ID: 1133377185.4491.269.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 13:33, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Someone suggested earlier that we should drop the binaries for
> nonsupported versions completely from the ftp site. Thoughts on this?
>
> If not, they should at least go into OLD as well. But personally, I'm
> for dropping them completely. If you're on something that old (heck, we
> have 7.0 binaries..), you can still build from source.
>

I'm against the idea... the cost for us is minimal, and the hassle
involved in building from source is quite large.

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-11-30 19:01:46 Re: Strange interval arithmetic
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-30 18:53:13 Shared locking in slru.c

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-11-30 19:12:08 Re: [GENERAL] What is the deal with mailing lists?
Previous Message Joshua Drake 2005-11-30 18:52:05 Re: What is the deal with mailing lists?