Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Date: 2005-11-30 18:59:35
Message-ID: 1133377185.4491.269.camel@camel (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 13:33, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Someone suggested earlier that we should drop the binaries for
> nonsupported versions completely from the ftp site. Thoughts on this?
> 
> If not, they should at least go into OLD as well. But personally, I'm
> for dropping them completely. If you're on something that old (heck, we
> have 7.0 binaries..), you can still build from source.
> 

I'm against the idea... the cost for us is minimal, and the hassle
involved in building from source is quite large. 


Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-11-30 19:12:08
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] What is the deal with mailing lists?
Previous:From: Joshua DrakeDate: 2005-11-30 18:52:05
Subject: Re: What is the deal with mailing lists?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-11-30 19:01:46
Subject: Re: Strange interval arithmetic
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-11-30 18:53:13
Subject: Shared locking in slru.c

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group