| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Security information page |
| Date: | 2005-11-28 09:26:12 |
| Message-ID: | 1133169972.2906.347.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 17:35 -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> >From the page:
>
> "Our approach covers fail-safe configuration options, a secure and
> robust database server as well as good integration with other security
> infrastructure software."
>
> What "good integration with other security infrastructure" can PGDG
> legitimately take credit for?
Kerberos, OpenSSL and LDAP integration, plus with published details of
how to link in with MSAD.
"Good integration" is my subjective judgement only. If it isn't the
feeling of the team, then we can alter it.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-11-28 11:04:45 | Re: svr2/unionfs |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-11-28 08:29:24 | Re: Security information page |