Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: elog in 7.4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Laszlo Hornyak <kocka(at)forgeahead(dot)hu>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: elog in 7.4
Date: 2004-09-22 14:12:44
Message-ID: 11330.1095862364@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 03:02:22PM +0200, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
>> Tom, is there other way in pg 7.4 than backporting PG_TRY? It seems a lot
>> of work.

> IIRC PL/Python had a hack involving sigsetjmp (which was removed in
> favor of the cleaner PG_TRY).  You could try doing that.

Indeed, PG_TRY is just formalizing something that was done already in a
few places.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-09-22 14:32:07
Subject: Re: todo: comment field for pg users and groups
Previous:From: Fabien COELHODate: 2004-09-22 14:11:36
Subject: Re: todo: comment field for pg users and groups

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group