Re: [HACKERS] Major Problem, need help! Can't run our

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tim Allen <tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Major Problem, need help! Can't run our
Date: 2005-11-15 04:32:14
Message-ID: 1132029134.7495.88.camel@home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 23:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tim Allen <tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > We've seen reports of people firing this particular foot-gun before,
> > haven't we? Would it make sense to rename pg_xlog to something that
> > doesn't sound like it's "just" full of log files? Eg pg_wal - something
> > where the half-educated will have no idea what it is, and therefore not
> > think they know what they can do with it.
>
> There's something in what you say. We'd have to rename pg_clog as well,
> since that's even more critical than pg_xlog ...

Rename them to pg_donttouchthis and pg_youneedthis.
--

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-11-15 04:35:35 Re: Major Problem, need help! Can't run our website!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-15 04:17:58 Re: [HACKERS] Major Problem, need help! Can't run our website!

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-11-15 04:48:07 Re: [HACKERS] Major Problem, need help! Can't run our
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-15 04:17:58 Re: [HACKERS] Major Problem, need help! Can't run our website!