Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: Add defenses to btree and hash index AMs

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add defenses to btree and hash index AMs
Date: 2005-11-06 21:51:04
Message-ID: 1131313864.6884.89.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
On Sun, 2005-06-11 at 15:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Add defenses to btree and hash index AMs to do simple sanity checks
> on every index page they read [...]
> (gist still needs the same treatment.)

If you're planning on doing the same for GiST (or if there's some reason
it can't easily be done), let me know -- otherwise I'll look into doing
that.

-Neil



In response to

Responses

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-11-06 22:31:37
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add defenses to btree and hash index AMs to do simple sanity
Previous:From: User AmDate: 2005-11-06 21:49:20
Subject: press - pr: Release date is 8 nov afterall (?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group