Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Time to start the PR machine

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>,PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time to start the PR machine
Date: 2005-09-30 20:13:45
Message-ID: 1128111226.5788.39.camel@camel (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 13:31, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Shared Row Locking: PostgreSQL's "better than row-level
> locking" has been improved further through the addition of
> shared row locks for foreign keys.  Shared locks will improve
> insert and update performance on some OLTP applications
> 			         ^^^^
> The word "some" sounds like it is a minority of OLTP applications.
> In general any moderately used OLTP app will benifit from this yes?
> many, most, or just say performance on OLTP applications.

well, it will really only help on those systems that were stressing out
our current design (and thats really hardware dependent too) so maybe
"busy", "heavy","high load" or just  "on OLTP applications". 

Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-09-30 20:29:35
Subject: Re: XA
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2005-09-30 19:27:38
Subject: PR: release text updated

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group