Re: Potential problem with HOT and indexes?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Postgres <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Potential problem with HOT and indexes?
Date: 2009-03-27 15:59:29
Message-ID: 11275.1238169569@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> We could reorganize the function slightly so that the IndexInfo is
> still available after the PG_TRY block, and then do something like
> "if (!indexInfo->ii_BrokenHotChain) reset indcheckxmin". This would
> ensure that we didn't wipe the flag if index_build had just set it.
> If I'm wrong and this can never happen, no harm done.

Committed with that change.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-03-27 16:25:11 Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-27 15:42:34 Re: 8.4 open items list