Re: typo? was: Version number in psql banner

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: typo? was: Version number in psql banner
Date: 2005-09-02 05:38:31
Message-ID: 1125639511.6682.24.camel@Andrea.peacock.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Am Donnerstag, den 01.09.2005, 23:34 -0500 schrieb Jim C. Nasby:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:18:25PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:

> As a side note, there's a typo in \?:
>
> \c[onnect] [DBNAME|- [USER]]
>
> Note the | where there should be a ].

No ;) The | stands for the alternative.
The whole block is optional, where
you can either type dbname or a hypen
for the database name - to be able to
just switch the user.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2005-09-02 05:40:37 Re: Two different defs of MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-09-02 05:03:47 Re: Version number in psql banner

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Koichi Suzuki 2005-09-02 10:36:42 Re: A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-09-02 05:03:47 Re: Version number in psql banner