Re: dangling lock information?

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, slony1-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dangling lock information?
Date: 2005-08-30 11:27:42
Message-ID: 1125401262.4824.28.camel@fuji.krosing.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On E, 2005-08-29 at 13:09 +0200, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> >On P, 2005-08-28 at 22:23 +0200, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I'm currently testing pgAdmin support for slony, on pgsql CVS HEAD, and
> >>encounter strange problems from time to time.
> >>After dropping and recreating the slony schema, all changes committed
> >>and all backends in <IDLE> state, I'm getting
> >>"relation with OID xxx does not exist" when I'm trying to add a path.
> >>This seems to be triggered inside slony functions when a
> >> LOCK _test.pg_config IN EXCLUSIVE MODE
> >>is performed.
> >>The problem is gone as soon as I close the connection I've been using
> >>for prior schema changes, and use a fresh connection.
> >>
> >>Does this description ring a bell for somebody?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >seems like the usual "pl/pgsql caches query plans and relation
> >referenced inside the cached plan is gone" thing
> >
> >
> Kind of, but the complete schema including procedures was dropped, so
> apparently after recreation the old plans were reused?!?

In that case this should probably be asked at slony list.

Added to CC.

--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2005-08-30 11:32:27 Re: VACUUM/t_ctid bug (was Re: GiST concurrency commited)
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2005-08-30 11:26:36 Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2