Re: OraToPg WAS: new project submissions on pgfoundry active?

From: "Chris Mair" <list(at)1006(dot)org>
To: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OraToPg WAS: new project submissions on pgfoundry active?
Date: 2006-03-08 09:10:58
Message-ID: 11237.193.206.186.101.1141809058.squirrel@www.endian.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


>> It is completely unrelated. The name is a (confusing) coincidence.
>
> Can we call it something else then? Anything else?

Hi there,

at last we came up with a new name: we'd like to call the project
"protopg" (which would stand for PROprietary TO PostGresql).
With all lowercase spelling.

Josh,
would that name qualify?

Bye :)
Chris.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Mair 2006-03-08 11:20:23 Re: OraToPg WAS: new project submissions on
Previous Message Chris Mair 2006-03-08 09:03:56 Re: OraToPg WAS: new project submissions on