Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: VACUUM DATABASE

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: VACUUM DATABASE
Date: 2005-07-28 06:21:13
Message-ID: 1122531673.3670.247.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 19:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:41:24PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> 
> > Forgive me if this is wrong, but I took that Alvaro was applying a
> > "reductio ad absurdum" argument (i.e. taking the piss). I laughed
> > heartily at the thought of LAZY becoming a PostgreSQL keyword. 
> 
> Ah, well, actually you are wrong, I was really suggesting that keyword
> because that's what we call the feature.  It doesn't sound that bad to
> me, but if you laughed at it then maybe it's really a bad idea.

Then I apologize, but agree with your conclusion.

I think a headline of "PostgreSQL gets LAZY" would be irresistable for
the online news scream-sheets.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2005-07-28 07:25:57
Subject: Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32
Previous:From: Gavin SherryDate: 2005-07-28 06:00:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Duplicate object names in GRANT

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group