On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 19:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:41:24PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Forgive me if this is wrong, but I took that Alvaro was applying a
> > "reductio ad absurdum" argument (i.e. taking the piss). I laughed
> > heartily at the thought of LAZY becoming a PostgreSQL keyword.
> Ah, well, actually you are wrong, I was really suggesting that keyword
> because that's what we call the feature. It doesn't sound that bad to
> me, but if you laughed at it then maybe it's really a bad idea.
Then I apologize, but agree with your conclusion.
I think a headline of "PostgreSQL gets LAZY" would be irresistable for
the online news scream-sheets.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2005-07-28 07:25:57|
|Subject: Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32|
|Previous:||From: Gavin Sherry||Date: 2005-07-28 06:00:24|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Duplicate object names in GRANT |