Re: VACUUM DATABASE

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: VACUUM DATABASE
Date: 2005-07-28 06:21:13
Message-ID: 1122531673.3670.247.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 19:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:41:24PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> > Forgive me if this is wrong, but I took that Alvaro was applying a
> > "reductio ad absurdum" argument (i.e. taking the piss). I laughed
> > heartily at the thought of LAZY becoming a PostgreSQL keyword.
>
> Ah, well, actually you are wrong, I was really suggesting that keyword
> because that's what we call the feature. It doesn't sound that bad to
> me, but if you laughed at it then maybe it's really a bad idea.

Then I apologize, but agree with your conclusion.

I think a headline of "PostgreSQL gets LAZY" would be irresistable for
the online news scream-sheets.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2005-07-28 07:25:57 Re: --enable-thread-safety on Win32
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2005-07-28 06:00:24 Re: [HACKERS] Duplicate object names in GRANT