Re: BUG #5067: vacuum problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Pasquale" <pasquale(dot)napolitano(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5067: vacuum problem
Date: 2009-09-19 23:33:01
Message-ID: 11225.1253403181@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

"Pasquale" <pasquale(dot)napolitano(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I don't connect any more to postres db because postgres needs to vacuum
> operation.
> Then, i use a standalone backend to connect to postgres db.
> Now i'm im in backend> and i write VACUUM FULL.

You don't really need VACUUM FULL, only VACUUM.

> I have this message:

> WARNING: database "postgres" must be vacuumed within 999455 transactions
> HINT: To avoid a database shutdown, execute a full-database VACUUM in
> "postgres".
> 999453

It's not an error, only a warning. You'll get a couple of those for
each table in the VACUUM, but after you finish it should stop complaining.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paulo 2009-09-20 01:00:03 BUG #5068: LIKE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-19 22:20:25 Re: notice on explicit primary key or index name