Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: NLS changes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: NLS changes
Date: 2003-09-14 15:39:15
Message-ID: 11199.1063553955@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> I just realized that scan.l should also be included, because there are
> four or five strings in there.  But maybe the pot should instead be
> generated on a non-clean tree so those strings are extracted from the .c
> files?  I downloaded the postgres.pot file from
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ and those strings are not
> included there.

Does seem like a problem.  plpgsql's .y and .l files need to be
considered also, and I think there are some ereports in guc-file.l.

Peter, which way do you want to fix it?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-09-14 16:48:32
Subject: Re: NLS changes
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-09-14 15:37:04
Subject: Re: NLS changes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group