On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 22:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Does that look better or worse to you?

I agree the patch's format is a bit off. What about

    "mi" btree (i),  tablespace "testspace"

"PRIMARY KEY" is currently separated from the rest of the index
description via a comma -- although on the other hand the column list
isn't preceded by a comma. Perhaps this whole format should be
rethought?

-Neil

In response to

• Re: psql: \d+ show tablespace of indices at 2005-06-03 02:15:55 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: psql: \d+ show tablespace of indices at 2005-06-04 02:10:16 from Qingqing Zhou

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig	Date: 2005-06-03 06:41:29
	Subject: Re: Tablespaces
Previous:	From: Christopher Kings-Lynne	Date: 2005-06-03 03:17:21
	Subject: Tablespaces

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig	Date: 2005-06-03 06:41:29
	Subject: Re: Tablespaces
Previous:	From: Qingqing Zhou	Date: 2005-06-03 05:29:29
	Subject: Re: Simplify Win32 Signaling code