Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: AllocSetReset improvement

From: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: a_ogawa <a_ogawa(at)hi-ho(dot)ne(dot)jp>,List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AllocSetReset improvement
Date: 2005-05-16 07:03:37
Message-ID: 1116227017.29081.4.camel@petra (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 11:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> I have another idea though: in the case you are looking at, I think
> that the context in question never gets any allocations at all, which
> means its blocks list stays null.  We could move the MemSet inside the
> "if (blocks)" test --- if there are no blocks allocated to the context,
> it surely hasn't got any chunks either, so the MemSet is unnecessary.

 Good point. There's same MemSet in AllocSetDelete() too.

	Karel

-- 
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: a_ogawaDate: 2005-05-16 12:58:35
Subject: Re: AllocSetReset improvement
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-05-16 05:52:39
Subject: Re: Minor comments typo fix in src/port

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group