Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Filip Hrbek <filip(dot)hrbek(at)plz(dot)comstar(dot)cz>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-02 19:54:33
Message-ID: 1112471673.49251.139.camel@home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 21:48 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > d) Bringing PL/Java into core will force a consistent documentation
> > > and, I imagine, a chapter of it's own in the main docs. I'm happy
> > > to write most of it but English is not my native language. Whatever
> > > I put into print will always benefit from a review.
> >
> > There is nothing stop'ng a chapter being added now,
>
> Actually there is: We don't ship documentation for software that we
> don't ship.

Very well, rephrase that a little.

There is nothing stopping additional links to documentation from being
added to the PostgreSQL website in the documentation section.
--

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message YL 2005-04-02 20:42:49 test
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-04-02 19:48:12 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message YL 2005-04-02 20:42:49 test
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-04-02 19:48:12 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?