| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David B <davidb999(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication solutions high volume db |
| Date: | 2005-03-30 00:16:37 |
| Message-ID: | 1112141797.27795.74.camel@jd2.commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 18:12 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 17:50, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > >
> > > I think I've narrowed it down to Slony and Mammoth.
> > > Any pro's or con's on one vs the other?
> >
> > Slony is more complicated to setup.
> > Slony requires triggers and cron.
>
> Triggers yes, cron no...
Oh? Good to know.
>
> > It used to be that Slony was timed replication. I do not know if that is
> > still the case.
>
> Not the case now. I didn't use it "back in the day" (you know, last
> year :)
I know.. that is so 2004 :)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., Your PostgreSQL solutions company. 503-667-4564
Custom programming, 24x7 support, managed services, and hosting
Open Source Authors: plPHP, pgManage, Co-Authors: plPerlNG
Reliable replication, Mammoth Replicator - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-03-30 00:16:58 | Re: Replication solutions high volume db |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-03-30 00:12:47 | Re: Replication solutions high volume db |