Re: Replication solutions high volume db

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: David B <davidb999(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication solutions high volume db
Date: 2005-03-30 00:12:47
Message-ID: 1112141567.31277.33.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 17:50, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> > I think I've narrowed it down to Slony and Mammoth.
> > Any pro's or con's on one vs the other?
>
> Slony is more complicated to setup.
> Slony requires triggers and cron.

Triggers yes, cron no...

> It used to be that Slony was timed replication. I do not know if that is
> still the case.

Not the case now. I didn't use it "back in the day" (you know, last
year :)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-03-30 00:16:37 Re: Replication solutions high volume db
Previous Message Roderick A. Anderson 2005-03-29 23:57:17 Re: Replication solutions high volume db