Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug 1500

From: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>,Lyubomir Petrov <lpetrov(at)sysmaster(dot)com>,List pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug 1500
Date: 2005-03-26 01:53:16
Message-ID: 1111801996.2388.77.camel@petra (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 02:32 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 20:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> writes:
> > > In digging around I discovered that it appears a decision was made to 
> > > remove to_char(interval) at the 8.1 release but I've been unable to 
> > > find the replacement for this functionality. This alarms me.
> > 
> > Yeah.  Karel Zak, who wrote that code, is convinced we should remove it,
> > but I don't think anyone else is ...
> 
>  I think I was Peter and Josh Berkus who convinced me that the code is
> bed. "we should remove..." is opinion only... 

s/bed/bad/ :-)

.. but my body dreams about bed, good night (morning?),

 	Karel

-- 
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Palle GirgensohnDate: 2005-03-26 02:09:53
Subject: Re: Patch for collation using ICU
Previous:From: Karel ZakDate: 2005-03-26 01:32:46
Subject: Re: Bug 1500

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group