From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gerhard Wiesinger <lists(at)wiesinger(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 |
Date: | 2010-08-30 16:22:53 |
Message-ID: | 11111.1283185373@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Gerhard Wiesinger <lists(at)wiesinger(dot)com> writes:
> I know the drawbacks of an EAV design but I don't want to discuss that. I
> want to discuss the major performance decrease of PostgreSQL 8.3
> (performance was ok) to PostgreSQL 8.4 (performance is NOT ok).
> Any further ideas how I can track this down?
> Can someone explain the difference in query plan from an optimizer point
> of view?
Since you haven't shown us the 8.3 plan, it's kind of hard to speculate ;-)
One thing that jumped out at me was that 8.4 appears to be expecting
multiple matches in each of the left-joined tables, which is why the
total rowcount estimate balloons so fast. I rather imagine that you are
expecting at most one match in reality, else the query isn't going to
behave nicely. Is this correct? Are you *sure* you analyzed all these
tables? And if that is how the data looks, where is the actual
performance problem? A bad rowcount estimate isn't in itself going
to kill you.
FWIW, in a similar albeit toy example, I don't see any difference
between the 8.3 and 8.4 plans or cost estimates.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gerhard Wiesinger | 2010-08-30 16:45:26 | Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 |
Previous Message | Gerhard Wiesinger | 2010-08-30 16:11:36 | Re: Major performance problem after upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 |