Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] A way to let Vacuum warn if FSM settings are low.

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] A way to let Vacuum warn if FSM settings are low.
Date: 2005-02-27 19:19:46
Message-ID: 1109531986.20045.140.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-patches
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 16:48 -0800, Ron Mayer wrote:
> Getting closer?

For me, yes. 

I agree with Bruce's comment on the use of the word "needed", and I
think your change reads better now.

The not-warnings seem a little wordy for me, but they happen when and
how I would hope for. 

So, for me, it looks like a polish of final wording and commit.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs


In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Ron MayerDate: 2005-02-27 20:07:03
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] A way to let Vacuum warn if FSM settings are low.
Previous:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2005-02-27 18:19:22
Subject: Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters deleted entries

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Ron MayerDate: 2005-02-27 20:07:03
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] A way to let Vacuum warn if FSM settings are low.
Previous:From: Keary SuskaDate: 2005-02-27 18:38:09
Subject: Re: Is this correct behavior for ON DELETE rule?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group